Editorial Policy
How questions, guides, legal summaries, sources, corrections, and AI-assisted drafts are handled.
Provincial separation
There is no single Canadian security guard exam. Every guide, question, and licensing statement must name its province. Ontario material is never republished for another province by changing a place name. An incomplete province remains outside navigation, internal links, structured data, and the sitemap.
Source hierarchy
- Provincial government and official licensing authority pages
- Official consolidated legislation and regulations
- Regulators and official testing providers
- Official training curricula and study guides
- Reputable institutional material for practical context
Competing practice sites, search snippets, social posts, and course marketing are not authorities for legal or licensing claims. Each published source record includes a URL, publisher, type, province where relevant, and last-checked date.
Question standards
Practice questions must be original, unambiguous, province-specific, and connected to one defensible answer. Distractors should be plausible without teaching unsafe conduct. Every question requires an explanation, sources, review date, category, difficulty, reviewer field, and stable ID.
We prohibit leaked questions, recalled questions presented as exact, copied government or commercial test banks, exam dumps, guaranteed-pass claims, and statements that independent questions are official. Arrest, detention, search, force, privacy, discrimination, and criminal-law questions receive additional source and editorial scrutiny.
Legal and practical writing
Legal summaries explain study concepts and are not advice for a real incident. They avoid absolute conclusions when authority depends on facts. Practical recommendations are labelled through context and must not be presented as legislation. Readers are directed to current official sources and qualified advice where appropriate.
AI assistance
AI tools may assist with drafting, code, test generation, consistency checks, or issue discovery. AI output is not a source or legal reviewer. Source-based editorial review remains required, and high-risk content must be checked against the official material before publication. The build system can catch structural and duplication problems, but it cannot replace human judgement.
Corrections and review dates
Reports are triaged by potential harm. A material legal, eligibility, cost, exam, or accessibility error is checked promptly across every place that may reuse the claim. Corrected content receives a new review date. Older legal content is identified by automated review-age checks.
Advertising independence
Advertising does not decide topics, answers, sources, or conclusions. Training and testing providers do not receive favourable editorial treatment in exchange for payment. Ads must remain visually and functionally separate from quiz answers and licensing instructions.